COMCARE

A Brief Overview of the Commonwealth Workers Compensation System

If you are a Commonwealth Employee, then your workers compensation rights are governed by the Safety, Rehabilitation & Compensation Act 1988.

Under this system, you are entitled to payment of weekly earnings (at prescribed rates) for all periods you are unfit for work.

You are also entitled to payment of reasonable and necessary medical expenses including surgery, rehabilitation for the injuries suffered at work as well as travel expenses when attending treatment.

If you suffer a permanent impairment as a result of your work-related injury, you may be entitled to claim a lump sum permanent impairment benefit, which can only be made when the injury has stabilised.  

If the injury has been caused through the “fault” or “negligence” of an employer, you can choose between a Common Law claim for damages (being a claim in negligence) or a lump sum permanent impairment claim.

You cannot claim both and once a decision is made, it cannot be changed.

To be entitled to pursue a Common Law claim you must have a permanent impairment assessment of at least 10% and the claim must be made within 3 years from the date of injury.

Under the Commonwealth Workers Compensation Scheme, there is very little scope for lawyers to be involved. The process is administrative and managed by the employer or insurer. Injured workers can of course obtain legal advice, but these costs (unlike the NSW scheme) are not paid by the worker’s compensation insurer.

If any part of a claim is disputed and proceeds to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT), then a portion of legal fees are payable by the insurer.

If you require more information please contact our Emma Mead who is our Accredited Specialised Personal Injury, Alice Davis or Ana Grguric at the Newcastle office of Burke, Elphick and Mead Lawyers.

The culture at Burke Elphick & Mead™ is what sets us apart from other firms. We are a close-knit team of committed lawyers, who are passionate about people and their rights. Our clients have access to professionals with experience and expertise across most facets of the law, including. Business and Commercial Law, Family Law, Criminal Law, Civil Law, Wills & Estates, Conveyancing, Motor Vehicle Claims, Accident and Insurance Claims, Compensation Claims, Workers Compensation.
Posted in Compensation Law, Legal, Workers Compensation Law | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Welcome to Nick Pidcock – Commercial Lawyer

Nick joined the Burke Elphick and Mead Team back in April this year. He is now heading up our Commercial Law Team.

     

Nick’s experience in the profession spans some twenty years and includes working in each facet of the law:  for the Bar (as a clerk to chambers), for the Bench (as a District Court Judge’s Associate) and as a solicitor.

He was admitted as a solicitor of the Supreme Court of New South Wales in 1999 and to the High Court of Australia in 2002.

Post-admission Nick has focused his skills in commercial litigation and advice, including building and construction disputes, transport law, insurance litigation (including public liability and aviation claims), Estates disputes, employment (industrial) disputes and alternate dispute resolution.

He has extensive advocacy experience in all jurisdictions including the Supreme, District and Local Courts, Consumer Trader & Tenancy Tribunal and Industrial Relations Commission (both Federal and State).

His non-litigious commercial experience includes all property transactions, acquisitions and disposals of businesses including hotels, commercial and retail lease agreements, the preparation of loan and other security documents, employee agreements and restraints and advice work in relation to indemnity, liability and quantum.

Nick’s emphasis is on providing timely, accurate advice and ensuring that his clients are fully informed.

He joins Burke Elphick & Mead from Sydney, via Orange.

Posted in Commercial Law, Legal | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Mobile Speed Camera’s Operational in NSW

From, 19 July 2010, mobile speed cameras will be operational in NSW.

What is a mobile speed camera?

A mobile speed camera is like a fixed speed camera, except that it can be moved from location to location throughout the state. The government will use independent contractors as technicians who will transport each camera to its scheduled location then set the camera up and check that it is operational. The camera will then be able to detect up to six cars per second, travelling in either direction. Any vehicle exceeding the speed limit will be photographed. The photograph, alone with information about speed, direction, location, time, date etc will then be uploaded, apparently in real time, and an infringement will be issued. 

How is it different to a fixed speeding camera?

First, a mobile speed camera will be moved from location to location around the state. The location of a camera at any particular time will be according to a pre-determined schedule. A list of mobile speed camera locations can be found on the RTA website at www.rta.nsw.gov.au

Secondly, unlike with fixed speed cameras, a mobile speed camera will not have any advance warning signs on the approach to it; however, there will be a sign after passing a camera to advise drivers that their speed has just been checked.

If you have received an infringement notice for a speeding offence detected by a mobile speed camera and you believe that you are not guilty of the offence, or if you have received a licence suspension as a result of a speeding offence, please contact Michael, Maria or Kara, our criminal and traffic law solicitors, to discuss your options.

Burke, Elphick and Mead Lawyers deliver a large range of legal services including business and commercial law, family law, criminal law, traffic law, employment, wills and estates, compensation, motor vehicle and insurance Should you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact our office.

 

Posted in Criminal Law | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Important AVO news for anyone who works with children

If you are a person who works with children, or who comes into contact with children during the course of your work then you should know that there may be implications for you if you have particular Apprehended Violence Orders made against you.

What type of AVO may have implications for child-related employment?

Any final apprehended violence order for which a person under 16 years of age is named as a protected person.

What are the implications?

Whenever a person applies for a position that may cause them to come into contact with children has to be subjected to a “Working With Children Check”. That check may reveal that the person is a “prohibited person” who cannot work with children, or otherwise will assess the risk that the person poses to any children.

There are three levels of risk estimate:

  1. No greater risk than anyone else,
  2. Some risk, or
  3. Significant risk.

If a person has had a final AVO made against them for the protection of any child then that fact alone will increase their estimated level of risk in a Working With Children Check. Therefore, it is important that any person whose employment involves working with children obtains proper legal advice before consenting to a final AVO where there are children involved.

If you have had an application for an AVO made against you and want legal advice, please contact Michael Burke, Maria Walz or Kara Greiner of the Burke Elphick and Mead Criminal Law Team.

Our Lawyers Merridy Elphick, Emma Mead, Nick Pidcock, Ashley Bithrey, Ana Grguic, and Alice Davis also offer assistance in a number of areas, including: Family Law, Personal Injury, Insurance or Compensation, Commercial Transactions or Contracts, Wills, Estates, and Powers of Attorney, Buying and Selling a Home or Business.  Should you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
Posted in Criminal Law | Tagged , | Leave a comment

More families staying together as divorce rate drops

There was a great article on the ABC News website www.abc.net.au on the 6 July 2010, reporting that there is new data out suggesting that divorce rates are dropping.

For the full article follow this link

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/07/06/2945549.htm

If you have a Family Law enquiry contact Merridy Elphick and Ashley Bithrey at the Newcastle office of Burke Elphick and Mead Lawyers.

Burke, Elphick and Mead deliver a large range of legal services including business and commercial law, family law, criminal, traffic, employment, wills and estates, compensation, motor vehicle and insurance. Should you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
Posted in Family Law, Legal | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Will your court matter require you to give your fingerprints to the police?

Some matters that are dealt with by the court, allow an order to be made by the court to attend upon a police station to provide your identification particulars, usually photograph and fingerprints. You need to be conscious of what these matters are and what the implications are for failing to do this. Section 134 of the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act sets out the power in the following terms: 134 Orders for the taking of identification particulars

(1) A court that finds an offence to which this section applies to have been proven against a person may order the person to present himself or herself in accordance with the terms of the order and submit to the taking, by the officer in charge of the police station specified in the order, of all particulars as are necessary to identify the person.

(2) The particulars may include the person’s photograph, finger-prints and palm-prints.

(3) The order is to contain a warning to the person that a failure or refusal to comply may result in the person’s arrest.

(4) A person who does not present himself or herself in accordance with the terms of the order may, at the direction of the officer in charge of the police station, be arrested without a warrant and taken into custody for such time as is reasonably necessary for the taking of particulars in accordance with the order.

(5) This section applies to the following offences:

(a) any indictable offence,

(b) an offence under section 42 of the Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Act 1999 of driving a motor vehicle on a road or road related area negligently occasioning death, negligently occasioning grievous bodily harm, furiously or recklessly or at a speed or in a manner that is dangerous to the public,

(c) an offence under any of the following provisions of the Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Act 1999:

(i) section 9(1A), (1), (2)(a) or (b), (3)(a) or (b), (4)(a) or (b),

(ii) section 12(1)(a) or (b),

(iii) section 15(4),

(iv) section 16.

(v) section 22(2),

(vi) section 29(2),

(vii) section 43.

(viii) section 70. (c1) an offence under section 5 or 6 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1979,

(d) an offence prescribed, or of a kind or description prescribed, by the regulations. If your matter before the court falls into any of the above categories then the court has, and is likely to execute, the power to make such an order. As you can see from the section, failure to comply with the order will result in the police exercising their powers of arrest and detention for the purposes of obtaining the identification particulars.

Should you have any doubt about whether this applies to your matter then do not hesitate to contact Michael Burke, Maria Walz or Kara Greiner of the Burke Elphick and Mead Criminal Law Team.

The culture at Burke Elphick & Mead™ is what sets us apart from other firms. We are a close-knit team of committed lawyers, who are passionate about people and their rights. Our clients have access to professionals with experience and expertise across most facets of the law, including. Business and Commercial Law, Family Law, Criminal La, Civil Law, Wills & Estates, Conveyancing, Motor Vehicle Claims, Accident and Insurance Claims, Compensation Claims, Workers Compensation. Should you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
Posted in Criminal Law, Legal | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Dads told to spend more time with kids

The ABC reported yesterday that The Australian Institute of Family Studies says many children get to spend less than 30minutes a day with their dads during the week.

The full report follow this link to the abc.net website http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/05/20/2904358.htm

If you have a family law matter, Merridy Elphick and Ashley Bithrey are our family lawyers working at the Newcastle office of Burke Elphick and Mead Lawyers.

Burke, Elphick and Mead Lawyers deliver a large range of legal services including business and commercial law, family law, criminal and traffic law, employment, wills and estates, compensation, motor vehicle and insurance law.Should you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
Posted in Family Law, Legal | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Trade Practices Act and Workers Compensation – Conflicting Entitlements?

Where a Corporation, in trade or commerce, supplies goods that are manufactured by it and the goods has a defect that causes injury to an individual, that individual may recover compensation from the corporation for their injury. This principle is contained in section 75AD of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (NSW) and is often referred to as “manufacturer’s liability”.

Accordingly, if an individual suffers an injury as a result of a defect in a good manufactured and supplied by a corporation, that individual may commence a claim against the corporation. However, where an entitlement to workers compensation exists, this cause of action is not available.

This is so due to the operation of s.75AI of the Trade Practices Act. This section states as follows: Section 75AD, 75AE, 75AF or 75AG does not apply to a loss in respect of which an amount has been, or could be, recovered under a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory that:

(a) relates to workers’ compensation; or

(b) gives effect to an international agreement. An example of the operation of section 75AI is as follows; An individual purchases new tyres from a tyre dealer and has them fitted to their vehicle; this dealer is a corporation that is both the manufacturer and supplier of the tyres. 4 weeks after purchasing the new tyres, the individual is travelling to work, when a tyre blows out causing them to lose control of the vehicle and subsequently crash into a tree. The individual suffers severe injuries as a result of the accident. As the individual was travelling to work they have entitlements under the Workers Compensation Act. If the individual had not been travelling to or from work (thus not been entitled to workers compensation), they may have brought a claim against the tyre manufacturer under s.75AD of the Trade Practices Act for supplying them with defective goods that caused injury. However, because of the operation of section 75AI, the existence of the workers compensation entitlements means that the individual is, unfortunately, unable to commence a claim against the manufacturer under section 75AD and is limited to receiving only statutory workers compensation benefits.

Alice Davis and Ana Grguric work with Emma Mead who is our Personal Injury Specialist. They can assist with your Personal Injury enquiries. They are based at the Newcastle office of Burke, Elphick and Mead Lawyers.

Burke, Elphick and Mead deliver a large range of legal services including business and commercial law, family law, criminal, traffic, employment, wills and estates, compensation, motor vehicle and insurance Should you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
Posted in Commercial Law, Legal, Workers Compensation Law | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Power of Attorney and Enduring Guardian

What is a Power of Attorney and Enduring Guardian and Why do I need one?  Suppose you are in an accident or become very ill. Suppose that as a consequence you are left in a coma or incapacitated. Who will pay your bills? Who will do your banking? Who will handle your money for you and ensure you receive proper care?

Contrary to popular belief, your parents, spouse or significant other are not always automatically empowered to make those decisions on your behalf. In many situations, without your express authority through a properly executed instrument, nobody else has the right to handle your finances or decide what health care you receive if you lose the capacity to make that decision for yourself. As to your finances, if you have not appointed anybody, it may be necessary for the Guardianship Tribunal—a government body—to appoint someone to be your legal guardian.

You would have no say in who the Guardianship Tribunal appoints. That is why it is essential to have a Power of Attorney and Enduring Guardian document drafted to ensure that you have that base covered. By hopping on the front foot, you can control who makes those decisions in the event something unforeseen happens to you. It’s your life and they’re your finances, so why not have your say.

So what’s the difference between a Power of Attorney and Enduring Guardian?           A Power of Attorney is a document that authorises a person to manage your financial affairs. The document has many applications, however the most obvious application is in the event due to some unforeseen circumstance you lose the capacity to look after your own finances. An alternate application is if you were travelling overseas and had bills and expenses that needed to be paid back home. In that circumstance you could appoint someone as Attorney for such time as you were travelling abroad. An Enduring Guardian document is a stronger document.

It empowers your appointee to make lifestyle choices on your behalf should you become incapacitated. An Enduring Guardian empowers the appointee to make almost whatever lifestyle choices you direct through the document. These usually include things such as what health care you receive, what medical procedures you undergo and what in-home care you receive.

These two documents are relatively simple, quick and cheap to draft. They afford you the peace of mind in knowing that in the event of unforeseen circumstances, you have a person appointed to deal with your financial and lifestyle matters and a set of guidelines and instructions which they must follow in making those decisions for you. Of course, everyone hopes to never be in the position of needing a Power of Attorney or Enduring Guardian. However, it is best to have the document there as a safeguard should something unforeseen happen to you.

The document does not give anyone any power until such time as that unforeseen circumstance occurs. Almost everyone should have these two documents to protect their interests.

Nick Pidcock at the Newcastle office of Burke Elphick & Mead Lawyers can assist you in making sure you have your affairs in order. Please Contact Nick with your Wills and Power of Attorney Enquiries.

Burke, Elphick and Mead deliver a large range of legal services including business and commercial law, family law, criminal, traffic, employment, wills and estates, compensation, motor vehicle and insurance Should you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
Posted in Legal, Wills, Estates & Power of Attorney's | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Potential Penalties for Company Directors

It is important for Company Directors to appreciate the extent of their duties and obligations under the Corporations Act 2001 and Income Tax Assessment Act 1936. The Australian Taxation Office is able to pursue Directors personally for unpaid PAYG amounts of Company employees that have not been forwarded to the ATO.

Company Directors are jointly and severally liable for the debt claimed. Directors of Companies have a duty to ensure that they know every detail about the Company’s cash flow, and ensure that the Company’s tax obligations are being met. You are never a Director “in name only”.

Your duty as a Company Director in that respect does not end simply because you have delegated certain tasks within the running of the Company to another Director. You must always have your finger on the pulse. The Directors are jointly and severally liable for any amount claimed under the Penalty Notice.

This means that if you are the Director of a Company being pursued by the ATO, then the ATO is able to pursue you personally for the whole of the amount claimed without having to pursue the other Directors. If you are issued with a Directors Penalty Notice, there are steps which you can take to remit the debt to the ATO.

Under section 222 AOB of the Income Tax Assessment Act you have the following options open to you:

  • Pay the amount owed to the ATO
  • Make an agreement with the Commissioner of Taxation in relation to the Company’s liability
  • Appoint an administrator of the Company under section 436A of the Corporations Act.
  • Begin to wind up the company within the meaning of the Corporations Act Once you have been provided with notice of the Directors Penalty Notice, you may wind up the Company and your personal liability to the ATO will be remitted.

Time limits apply. You typically have 14 days within the date of the Penalty Notice to start winding the Company up. The Penalty Notice is usually provided by post and as such, the rule on postal service will allow for an extra 4 business days on top of the 14 day window, however, you should always act fast if you find yourself in that situation.

A Company does not begin to be wound up until the members of the Company (not the Directors) resolve by special resolution that the Company should be wound up. As such, once a Directors Penalty Notice is served an extraordinary meeting of the Company’s shareholders should be called so that it may be resolved that the Company be wound up. Of course the primary objective is to avoid ever being in a situation where you are required to respond to a Directors Penalty Notice.

This can very simply be avoided by ensuring that you are fulfilling your obligations as a Director including ensuring that the Company is meeting all of its tax obligations and ensuring that funds withheld from employees, be forwarded to the ATO are not going elsewhere.

Nick Pidcock is the Commercial Lawyer at the Newcastle office of Burke, Elphick & Mead Lawyers. Please feel free to contact him with her Commercial Law enquiries.

The culture at Burke Elphick & Mead™ is what sets us apart from other firms. We are a close-knit team of committed lawyers, who are passionate about people and their rights. Our clients have access to professionals with experience and expertise across most facets of the law, including. Business and Commercial Law, Family Law, Criminal La, Civil Law, Wills & Estates, Conveyancing, Motor Vehicle Claims, Accident and Insurance Claims, Compensation Claims, Workers Compensation Should you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
Posted in Commercial Law, Legal | Tagged , , | Leave a comment